CMHC’s latest Housing Market Analysis cites imbalances, overheating, overvaluation
The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) has released its latest Housing Market Assessment (HMA). The current HMA is based on preliminary data up to the fourth quarter of 2020, and market intelligence up to February 2021 at the national level and detailed results for 15 CMAs. According to the CMHC, sustained housing price increases still outpacing the recovery in fundamental factors, such as labour income, means Canada’s national housing market remains moderately vulnerable, with more pronounced vulnerabilities in large cities and smaller centres.
“The impacts of the ongoing pandemic continued to influence Canada’s housing markets in the fourth quarter of 2020,” said Bob Dugan, CMHC’s chief economist. “Strong housing market activity and price appreciation contributed to the emergence of new imbalances in some markets, or contributed to the worsening of existing imbalances in already vulnerable markets.”
According to the CMHC: the impacts of the pandemic continued to influence housing market conditions in Canada in the fourth quarter of 2020. Sales remained elevated relative to new listings in several regions and there is now evidence of overheating at the national level.
Evidence of overheating in Canada
Imbalances of concern include an increase in the number of CMAs displaying evidence of overheating, price acceleration and overvaluation. Housing markets across the country continued to experience elevated sales in the fourth quarter while new listings remained low.
Sustained price growth contributed to the emergence of price acceleration and overvaluation imbalances in additional markets, particularly in Eastern Canada. Among the 3 largest metropolitan areas, the degree of overall vulnerability of the housing market in Toronto moved to high. Montréal and Vancouver remain at moderate.
The short-term impacts of the pandemic led to an increase in the proportion of unoccupied rental apartments in many regions. The excess inventories in certain segments of the rental market can be a source of risk to short-term local market stability. However, the overall supply of housing remains low.
CMHC Housing Market Assessment Highlights:
- The Toronto and Ottawa housing markets moved from moderate to high degrees of vulnerability. Price acceleration in Toronto and overvaluation in Ottawa were factors in driving the rating change. As Hamilton was already showing a high degree of vulnerability in our last HMA, the three largest Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) in Ontario are all now rated with a high degree of vulnerability.
- Vancouver’s housing market vulnerability remained moderate. However, Vancouver saw the quarterly pace of sales return to levels not seen since 2017, leading to significant price increases. Also, with significant downward pressure on rental demand amid the pandemic and high vacancy rates in newer rental units with high rents, Vancouver has moderate evidence of excess inventories*.
- In Montréal, the degree of overall vulnerability in the housing market remained moderate. However, the quarterly pace of sales set new records. This caused significant price appreciation in Montréal, meaning the emergence of overvaluation imbalances must be closely monitored.
- Due to increased evidence of both overheating and price acceleration, the Halifax housing market is now rated at a high degree of vulnerability. The Moncton housing market maintains a high degree of vulnerability driven by persistent overvaluation.
- Calgary is now rated with high evidence of excess inventories*, while Edmonton moved from low to moderate evidence of overvaluation. Overall, the housing markets in both of Alberta`s largest CMAs moved to a moderate degree of vulnerability.
- The Victoria housing market remains at a moderate degree of vulnerability, while Saskatoon, Regina, Winnipeg, Quebec, and John’s show an overall rating of low vulnerability.
According to CMHC, in previous editions of the HMA, the factor “overbuilding” was used to indicate an elevated number of unoccupied new units in the homeownership market or a high vacancy rate in the rental market. The name of this factor could have led one to believe the HMA reported on excessive construction activity. However, this was not the intended interpretation; we intended to report on excessive quantity of unoccupied units in the short term that could place the owners of those units at financial risk. This HMA introduces the term “excess inventories” instead.
Excess inventories are a risk even in unaffordable markets. However, even if there are short-term periods of excess inventories, such markets would continue to benefit from long-term increases in housing supply.