Most Canadians want to keep inflation targeting regime, Bank of Canada report says
OTTAWA – Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem says different groups of Canadians experience price increases uniquely, and that the central bank will keep that in mind as it decides on a policy framework for the next five years.
For three decades, the central bank has set its interest rate target with the goal of keeping inflation at two per cent, but it reviews its inflation-management mandate every five years.

This year, the bank opened consultations to a wider group, which Macklem said provided officials with more insight into how Canadians see price increases and interest rates.
For one thing, he said, it became clear that Canadians don’t like interest rates too high or too low, and want a balance between some return on their savings and making sure the cost of borrowing isn’t too high.
Macklem said experiences with prices can vary between low-income and high-income households, and between households in urban and remote communities.
He said that feedback will work its way into the bank’s decision on whether to stick to its current inflation-targeting regime or advise the government that it should take additional factors into account.
The comfort zone the bank sets for its inflation target will help determine what happens to its key policy interest rate, which can affect the rates charged for mortgages and loans.
The last decade has seen a change for central banks with a shift to a low-interest rate environment after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis.
Central banks have also looked to unconventional tools to push money into the economy and drive down the cost of borrowing for consumers and businesses, just as the Bank of Canada has done over the past year with its bond-buying program.
“We’re probably going to be in this low interest rate environment for a considerable (period of time). It looks like a bit of a regime shift. We’re probably going to be using those tools more frequently,” Macklem said.
Also on quantitative easing, “the majority supported this approach and felt the Bank of Canada should continue making these purchases as needed.”
I am pretty sure the vast majority of Canadians have no idea what QE is. Who the hell did they interview?
— Steve Saretsky (@SteveSaretsky) March 31, 2021
“We see no froth”
Oh, you thought we meant in RE actually the Office Latte Machine broke down
— Ron Butler (@ronmortgageguy) March 30, 2021
The summary on consultations said the majority of participants favoured having the bank keep inflation at an annual target, finding steady and predictable price increases best for their own financial planning.
There was openness to the bank aiming to hit its target over a longer period, so that despite periods of fast and slow price increases, overall inflation averages a specific amount over time.
Experts the bank has consulted and average Canadians favoured this alternative framework among others presented, but both groups worried what the ups and downs would mean for household finances, even if it meant economic stability overall.
Thousands of Canadians told us what they think about the #economy, #inflation and what we do. This input will inform our discussions with @FinanceCanada about our approach to monetary policy. #LetsTalkInflationhttps://t.co/f8jkTQY902
— Bank of Canada (@bankofcanada) March 31, 2021
There was an argument for the bank to help grow the job market, with support from some parliamentarians in the consultations, but the idea wasn’t seen as feasible given the bank’s current set of policy tools.
Employment is part of the bank’s policy thinking, Macklem said, adding that some Canadians want the central bank to be more explicit on the subject in its communications.
“Full employment and low, stable inflation go hand-in-hand,” Macklem said.
“If you don’t have full employment, those missing jobs, those missing incomes, are going to put downward pressure on inflation, and you’re going to get pulled down below your target.”
Inflation over the last year has remained below the central bank’s target zone, hitting a pandemic-era high of 1.1 per cent in February. But the bank’s report noted the belief from participants that prices are rising faster than the official reading of Statistics Canada’s consumer price index.
Perceptions on inflation can diverge from official statistics based on what people are buying, be it everyday goods like groceries or larger purchases like a car that may happen every few years, Macklem said.
More recently, the bank’s report notes, participants voiced concerns in particular about the rising cost of housing in cities that they felt was increasing “far beyond” the two per cent inflation target.
The price of homes doesn’t factor into inflation as directly as many people think, Macklem said, saying the measure reflects the costs to maintain a house that are smoother over time than purchase prices.
BANK OF CANADA GOVERNOR TIFF MACKLEM SAYS HE IS SEEING WORRYING SIGNS THAT HOUSEHOLD INDEBTEDNESS IS WORSENING AS HOUSING PRICES RISE – NEWSPAPER INTERVIEW
— *Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) March 31, 2021
Canada: #1 at Inflating Home Prices https://t.co/egcdyHlXE9
— John Pasalis (@JohnPasalis) March 31, 2021
“We need to understand the different inflation experiences of different communities of Canadians,” he said.
“Part of that is being transparent, being accountable, explaining these things and explaining why we do what we do.”
Mounting debt ‘worrying’ as Canadians stretch to chase rising home prices, says Bank of Canada governor https://t.co/rrHbKJKc8K pic.twitter.com/1hp3DdLVZB
— FP Investing (@fpinvesting) March 31, 2021
Sounds a lot like Canada. Nobody wants to take responsibility for the egregiously unaffordable house prices.
— Steve Saretsky (@SteveSaretsky) March 29, 2021
If our economic confidence is based on a booming housing market, we’ve lost the plot as a country. Increasing inequality (owners vs renters) built on flimsy economic growth from trading houses, driving cars longer distances and increased debt is not a recipe for econ prosperity. https://t.co/WY4BgFdX03
— Evan Siddall (@ewsiddall) March 29, 2021
— Scott Ingram CPA, CA (@areacode416) March 31, 2021
Here's avg/median/HPI for C01:
Sep 20: $772K / 663 / 680
Feb 21: $728K / 665 / 658avg ⬇️6%, median = flat, HPI ⬇️3%
Some buildings are back to pre-COVID levels, some not. /5
— Scott Ingram CPA, CA (@areacode416) March 31, 2021
The flipside to buying cashflow negative investment properties is that investors have the federal government and the Bank of Canada in their corner doing everything possible to inflate home prices.
This is largely why they’re so bullish. https://t.co/vfPsn5zuUt
— John Pasalis (@JohnPasalis) March 31, 2021
Tiff Macklem responds to BMO’s call to “break the psychology’ of the Canadian housing market to cool prices
“If you’ve got a mortgage, or if you’re considering a major purchase you can be confident that interest rates will be low for a long time.”pic.twitter.com/MRXoTvghPQ https://t.co/IeefXdA5jP
— not inklessPW ? (@inklessPW) March 31, 2021
not to be outdone by his boss, Bank of Canada Deputy Governor also responds to BMO’s call to “break the psychology’ of the housing market to cool prices
“at these low interest rates if you can get in it’s not that costly to carry the cost of a house”pic.twitter.com/kzNHYlCeBQ https://t.co/IeefXdA5jP
— not inklessPW ? (@inklessPW) March 31, 2021